The Night Circus
sat on the table in Waterstone’s; its starkly designed cover shouting for attention.There is somethign rather strange and terrifying on the novel and it reminds me a little of Gordon Dahlquist’s The Glass Books of the Dream Eaters in its ambition. It is, though, easier to read in its different styling. Like the Dahlquist, this book is about magic though defining it so much more broadly.
Celia Bowen, who takes (though later discards) the nom-de-plume Miranda, is taken in by the magician known as Prospero the Enchanter. Morgenstern announces and uses the Tempest as a backdrop to her novel wherein she takes Shakespeare’s theme of art and artifice and mixes it with the fin-de-siécle. Prospero the Enchanter faes away, little noticed by his crowds until he is believed to be dead.
Meanwhile Chandresh LeFevre is dreaming up the Night Circus with an invited group fo dinner guests. The Circus is more than a three ring affair: it dazzles and maps itself to the visitor’s desires. On opening night, the Twins, Poppet and Widget, are born each with the power of sight in a different direction. Poppet can read the future whilst Widget understands the past. At the centre of the circus burns a cauldron of white fire, anchoring it and giving it a focus point. He, though, loses this focus gaining a convex view of the world and Marco, his assistant and unwilling pawn in the game, helps him to forget either throgh aiding his drinking or fashioning rooms around the house, redefining the space.
Meanwhile, Federick Thiessen falls in love with the circus, following it around and visiting it whenever he can. A clock maker by trade, he designs and gives his wares away so that he might visit it more often. In the process he forms the reveurs, a clique of fellow fanantics, after an article of his is published. His love affair spawns others though love in Morgenstern’s world is a deadly affair unless you know the rules and consequences.
It becomes apparent that the circus is a god game, one where the pawns become aware of their predicament and try to change the rules to avoid the planned ending. It is somewhat tempered when the subjects begin to take on the games and to create their own rules. Perhaps they play it better than Prospero could have imagined and find a way of making it their own arena.
Celia and Marco’s love affair, initially benighted by Isobel’s infatuation with him, allows both of them to explore the memory palace that both create through their own illusions and strengths. They create a labyrinth orthagonal to the real world, much like Prospero has done, and removes themselves having found a new anchor to hold the circus together . I have not seem memory palaces like these since Mary Gentle’s Rats and Gargo
Bailey, the new anchor and Poppet’s love since childhood days, believe while heartely in the place and is able to take it on in the new century. When Celia and Marco remove themselves from the world in the final blaze of the while fire, he is the only one able to relight it as he understands the passion invested it by its denizens and fans. His trek to find the circus and to join it becomes something deeper which he can only understand as takes on the task at hand. In the end he is able to take the circus on somewhere else, magical but not magical. His own belief in the fantastic means that he is ther perfect person to take the story on into the twentieth century, as the timeframe of the novel is the 1890s, a time of experimentation and change.
This is wonderful novel which involves and draws the reader into its dream. Like Shakespeare’s Prospero, a form of magic is ended but it transmutes into something quite different and subtle. Initially the book struck me as something along the lines of Christopher Priest’s novels in its manipulation of the mundane, or perhaps Audrey Niffeneger’s The Night Library, but it goes beyond that and, I suspect, the initiated would find even more.
I look forward to donning my scarlet scarf for future visits.